Tagged: photography business

Contax 645 Reviewfor Wedding Photographers

I had dreamed of the Contax 645 for years. Mostly due to “gear acquisition syndrome.” I believed this camera would make me a better photographer. In the back of my head, I knew it wouldn’t, but I learned to ignore the rational voice. Six years ago, I finally reached a point where I could afford a Contax 645. Surprisingly, it did change my work for the better. With the camera, I could finally achieve the vision I had in my head. I was immediately in love! But the camera also has a dark side. I thought I would share my experience with others, so I created the detailed Contax 645 review video below.

To sum up my feelings from the Contax 645 review above, I would simply offer the following pros and cons –


  • The legendary Zeiss 80mm f/2 planar lens – it’s a dream factory
  • Available battery grip – easier vertical shooting, better battery life, and enables use of standard AA batteries
  • Auto-focus and exposure meter unlike some older medium format cameras
  • Ease of use – simple dials for major functions, good ergonomics, not too complex


  • Price – popularity has driven the prices surprisingly high (too high)
  • Parts availability – all spare parts are now gone. Any major problem will require cannibalizing parts from another camera
  • Prima Donna – when the camera works, it’s amazing, but it’s known for random errors and finicky operation
  • Film flatness – sometimes the film doesn’t lay flat on the film plane, causing weird focus issues. Solving this problem can be really tough
  • The camera only operates in full-stops (no 1/3 stops), although the aperture can be set in half-stops
  • It weighs a ton with the battery grip, albeit less than a Hasselblad H1

Thoughts to Consider

The Contax 645 is worth exploring if your photographic style necessitates this particular camera. If your style is built around shooting wide-open apertures for creamy backgrounds, then you should consider the Contax 645. However, if you commonly stop down the aperture, then the greatest asset of the Contax 645 is wasted. Because I was having film flatness issues, I decided to try a Hasselblad H1 with the equally legendary 100mm f/2.2 lens. Since that time, I’ve hardly touched the Contax 645, especially for professional work. If you’re seriously looking at the Contax, consider it’s problems, and whether another camera might be a better choice.

With all that said, I still own the camera and would buy it again today if I had to do so.

Hope the above Contax 645 review helped. If you enjoyed the video, consider subscribing to my YouTube photography channel. It’s dedicated to all things film, digital, and hybrid photography. You can also find my most recent work on Instagram. You can also find more information for photographers right here.

Architecting Lightroom 5 for Speed

Let’s face it – Lightroom is a two faced beast. Like the Roman god Janus, Lightroom presents photographers with two distinctly different faces. On the one side, Lightroom contains some amazing functionality. For a wedding photographer, Lightroom contains 90-95% of what you would want for photo editing and digital asset management. I would even argue Lightroom has too much functionality (book module…anyone, anyone?). On the other side lies Lightroom’s problem. Ever since Lightroom 3, application performance has deteriorate. Import, culling, sorting, editing and exporting have all become dog slow functions. So, professional photographers live with a two-sided compromise – love the functionality, hate the performance. If you love Lightroom’s functionality, but crave more speed, then read on.

My setup

Before I jump into a bunch of suggestions for changing things around, let me first familiarize you with my setup. I am going to use my setup as an example to help illustrate my points. I’ll be the first to admit that my brand new 2013 Mac Pro is not representative of most users. That’s OK, it’s only being used for an example, and not for benchmarking. In fact, you’ll find no benchmarks here (more on that in a moment). lightroom-architecture-01-20140213 What’s important to note about my system is the various disc types and how they’re connected to the computer. Nikon D4 is a memory card reader simply connected by USB3. Nearly all photographers would import photos in this manner. Macintosh HD is a PCI-connected SSD drive. By far, this is the fastest drive on the system (nearly 1,000 MB/s), but it’s also the smallest and most costly. External is a huge Drobo 5D storage array connected via Thunderbolt. The Thunderbolt connection is fast and the Drobo is the largest disc. Backup is also connected via Thunderbolt. It’s not the largest or the fastest, but it’s just for backup.

Location, location, location

Correctly choosing where to store Lightroom data can have a large impact on speed. Through lot’s of reading and some extensive testing, I’ve arrived at a solution that works well for me, and should work well for most. I’m not including benchmarks because everyone has different systems and discs, so a benchmark just wouldn’t make any comparative sense. Instead, I’ll explain the theory below. But first, recommendations for where to store what –

  • Lightroom catalog – the fastest disc you have, ideally an SSD drive. The disc should also use your fastest interconnect. PCI, SATA and Thunderbolt would be ideal. USB2 and Firewire would not.
  • Lightroom cache folder – same as above – put it on your fastest disc.
  • Main photo archive – A large disc with a reasonably fast connection. Because most of us have terabytes of photos, cost trumps speed for this disc.
  • Backup – A large, cheap disc. Need not be terribly fast, as long as it doesn’t cause your backup jobs to lag.

lightroom-architecture-02-20140213 As you can see above, I import via a USB3 card reader directly to the “Ingest” folder on the External drive. After I cull the photos to identify the selects, I import them via Lightroom 5, which moves the selects to the main Photos folder. This also loads up the Lightroom Catalog and Lightroom Cache with info on the new photos. Because my Macintosh HD drive is the fastest, my Lightroom catalogs and cache files live there. Quick side note – I do not cull in Lightroom. No matter the setup, I find it way too slow due to the idiotic insistence on pre-rendering RAW files. Instead, I use Photo Mechanic by CameraBits (more on that in a future post).

Why this works

Interestingly, Lightroom is really “chatty” with catalogs and cache, but not so much with the native RAW files. When editing photos, sorting or adjusting metadata, Lightroom “talks” most to the catalog and cache files. Also, it does so in small chunks of data. It rarely references the native files at all. This means that the most accessed data (catalog and cache) should live on the fastest disc. Because the native photos files aren’t accessed much, they have the freedom to live anywhere. Sure, you could also put them on your fastest disc. However, if you managing an archive as large as mine, that could get really expensive.

Technical tidbits

So what’s happening under the covers? Imagine a hard drive is a popular grocery store on a Sunday just after church let’s out. It’s a busy time with many shoppers buying lots of things. Upfront are the registers with lots of people waiting in line. Just like the grocery store, your hard disk has a line, or queue. When not much is happening, the queue is essentially zero. However, when lot’s of data is being written, the queue can get rather long. Even worse, when lot’s of people are buying just one or two items, the lines are insane. Just like the grocery store, writing lots of little data bits to a disk can really slow things down. As you work, Lightroom needs to write lots of little updates to the catalog and cache. Therefore, the queue can get long and performance suffers. To combat this, we simply use faster and faster disks. Hence, raw disc speed and the speed of the connection is important – primarily for the catalog/cache disk.

For Windows users, you can monitor the disk queue by opening the Task Manager, then select the Performance tab and lastly click on Resource Monitor (admin privileges required). Look for “queue depth” under the disk section. Queue depths of 0-1 is essentially idle. Depths of 2-5 are busy. Anything more is swamped.

Bonus performance tips

Want some other ideas to speed up Lightroom and your photo editing. Try the ideas below. I’ll be explaining these in detail in a future post –

  • Increase the Lightroom cache size under Preferences
  • Import photos using “Copy as DNG”
  • Learn the keyboard shortcuts and stay off the mouse
  • When exporting, divide the batch by the number of processor cores and run one export per core

That’s all for today. Happy “wed-iting.”

PUBLISHED – Hunter Photographic Featured in PDN EDU Magazine

I’m certainly very proud to announce that we’ve recently been featured in PDN EDU magazine, which it targeted towards young and upcoming photographers. This time around, PDN has put together a “data” issue, where they discuss many aspects of data management important to photographers.

They chose to feature Hunter Photographic for a few reasons. First, I have never been shy about sharing my experience with Google Analytics and SEO. Based on my prior career experience, I prioritized the use of both within my business. The results speak for themselves. We rocked to the top of Google for our most critical search terms in less than 18 months. On top of that, I’m able to measure our results with Google Analytics and respond quickly. This approach has truly changed the nature of my business for the better, and I highly recommend new and established photographers embrace the power of SEO and Google Analytics.

So, go see the entire issue for yourself. The entire PDN EDU issue is online and free to the public. There is a wealth of great content across the entire issue and I highly recommend a read.

Cleveland wedding photographer Hunter Photographic featured in PDN EDU magazine